5 ms·
I was excited, but the fact that this is (well, WAS) violating the GPL by being MIT licensed was a major downer. I'd be very interested in an org-mode parser wh
by Lord_Nightmare 7y ago
I was excited, but the fact that this is (well, WAS) violating the GPL by being MIT licensed was a major downer. I'd be very interested in an org-mode parser which is NOT GPL-licensed, specifically because it is effectively impossible to integrate GPL code as a plugin (unless your editor is also GPL), which was one of the stated goals of this project.
Hence, someone would have to properly clean-room reverse-engineer org-mode in order to achieve 100% compatibility, or make a somewhat-incompatible implementation based on the reference docs instead.
As I understand it, Markdown has significant limitations which org-mode doesn't have, but is under a 3BSD-style license. (It also has issues of x+1 slightly incompatible implementations)
- juki 7y agoI believe Gitlab and Github both render Org files with OrgRuby[1], which is MIT. [1]: https://github.com/wallyqs/org-ruby https://github.com/wallyqs/org-ruby
- black-tea 7y agoWhy can't you make a GPL plugin for whatever editor you use?
- Lord_Nightmare 7y agoIt depends on whether it is an essential dll or an optional plugin. I probably could have phrased that better originally.