5 ms·

> so much display of misogyny and sexism against a woman scientist There are no woman scientists, science has no gender. The article is sexiest not people who

by kpp 7y ago

> so much display of misogyny and sexism against a woman scientist There are no woman scientists, science has no gender. The article is sexiest not people who are curious what Dr. Bouman actually did to be honored to mention in BBC article.

nagVenkat 7y ago
We don’t exist in a purely meritocratic and egalitarian society. Maybe you have never been told that you are not good enough for some work but growing up in deeply paternalistic society, I constantly heard “women are too stupid for hard sciences and they should just stick to kitchens”. If celebrating her achievements in this way changes minds of a few people and inspires a few girls to believe in themselves, I think it is worth the “biased” coverage that she is getting for her work.
- kpp 7y ago
  > I grew up hearing women are too stupid for hard sciences Bad for you. Thanks God I grew up in a society where every person no matter of gender and age can do hard science.
  - nagVenkat 7y ago
    Nobody is saying that only some societies have both genders doing hard sciences. It’s the matter of opportunity.
scott_s 7y ago
People don’t surrender their outside identity when they become a scientist.
- kpp 7y ago
  People don't surrender their outside political views, their lineage, sexual orientation and other background either. See how stupid the article would sound if titled: "Jane Doe: The divorced homosexual black democratic woman with three children behind the first black hole image". Science matters.
charliepark 7y ago
It's fallacious to presume that — because gender, sex, race, etc. shouldn't impact peoples' opportunities — that we should treat is as though it doesn't impact them. This is a good article on the concept: https://everydayfeminism.com/2013/09/dont-see-race/ https://everydayfeminism.com/2013/09/dont-see-race/ [Edit:] Or this, as a complementary one: https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/i-dont-see-race https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/i-dont-see-race

by kpp 7y ago

nagVenkat 7y ago

We don’t exist in a purely meritocratic and egalitarian society. Maybe you have never been told that you are not good enough for some work but growing up in deeply paternalistic society, I constantly heard “women are too stupid for hard sciences and they should just stick to kitchens”. If celebrating her achievements in this way changes minds of a few people and inspires a few girls to believe in themselves, I think it is worth the “biased” coverage that she is getting for her work.

kpp 7y ago
> I grew up hearing women are too stupid for hard sciences Bad for you. Thanks God I grew up in a society where every person no matter of gender and age can do hard science.
- nagVenkat 7y ago
  Nobody is saying that only some societies have both genders doing hard sciences. It’s the matter of opportunity.

scott_s 7y ago

People don’t surrender their outside identity when they become a scientist.

kpp 7y ago
People don't surrender their outside political views, their lineage, sexual orientation and other background either. See how stupid the article would sound if titled: "Jane Doe: The divorced homosexual black democratic woman with three children behind the first black hole image". Science matters.

charliepark 7y ago

It's fallacious to presume that — because gender, sex, race, etc. shouldn't impact peoples' opportunities — that we should treat is as though it doesn't impact them. This is a good article on the concept: https://everydayfeminism.com/2013/09/dont-see-race/ https://everydayfeminism.com/2013/09/dont-see-race/ [Edit:] Or this, as a complementary one: https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/i-dont-see-race https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/i-dont-see-race