5 ms·
This line of conversation is my point. You're debating someone who is acting in bad faith. You've already lost the thread because he's just going to come back w
by ratling 7y ago
This line of conversation is my point. You're debating someone who is acting in bad faith. You've already lost the thread because he's just going to come back with more circular bullshit.
- mistermann 7y agoCould you please explain how I'm acting in bad faith? Perhaps cite a few key exchanges to demonstrate. > he's just going to come back with more circular bullshit. Asking people to justify their claims, and pointing out falsehoods or logical errors in their responses, is "circular bullshit" now? I clearly stated I am playing Devil's advocate. I concede points where they are valid. I make no (other than conversational) claims without backing them up, how many claims has OP made without providing evidence for? The discussion is curtailment of free speech (the general principle, not the First Amendment - try to get someone to even admit there's a difference without changing the subject) - I am arguing that we better have very good reasons for it, supported by evidence. Fashionable popular opinion is not evidence.