5 ms·
Counterpoint, maybe only films should be eligible for Oscars, as Oscars are for "film makers". Digital cameras would not qualify, right? Seriously, there was
by TheLoneAdmin 8y ago
Counterpoint, maybe only films should be eligible for Oscars, as Oscars are for "film makers". Digital cameras would not qualify, right?
Seriously, there was a huge gulf in quality when the best home TV was 19" NTSC 4/3. Nowadays, my picture quality exceeds that of most movie screens (except for imax). I don't see any reason to differentiate.
- gamblor956 8y agoYou have an 8k TV at home? Lucky you. If not, then your home TV doesn't even begin to approach the quality of a modern movie theater.
- detaro 8y agoIs that actually that widespread in theaters? I can't find good sources, but most I can find suggest that it's not yet.
- TheLoneAdmin 8y agoI said "most movie screens", not a theatre with the best equipment. My point is that the difference between 2k/4k/8k is noticeable, but not significant. NTSC, at 480i, was a magnitude worse than film.
- ttsda 8y agoWhen colour film showed up there were separate colour and black and white Oscars.