> tech giants from China and Russia don't have employees protesting military aid just because 'the technology is scary and can do harm'. Citation needed? How d

> tech giants from China and Russia don't have employees protesting military aid just because 'the technology is scary and can do harm'. Citation needed? How do you know this? And if they don't have that, it seems like they might not have that due to totalitarian rule and a fear of the population to speak opinions. That's not a society we should emulate. > I also highly doubt the US 'setting an example' will change any of their minds. Why not? I think that it would. Demonstrating the economic impact of focusing these developments on useful, productive concerns would leave them in the dust. Seems like they would like to keep up? I don't follow your logic. > If none of the United States tech giants sign with the Government, it's very likely that the US's technology used for an upcoming world war will be inferior to that of the US's enemies. Again, I disagree and view it as the opposite. Also, if we are so bent on preparing for this future war - without conversation or allowing any kind of other ideas at all - it seems like the war will be a self-fulfilling prophecy.