6 ms·
One of my clients said the other day: "When working with a fixed fee there's always 1 party that 'loses'". I tend to agree, either it ends up more work than exp
by icoder 8y ago
One of my clients said the other day: "When working with a fixed fee there's always 1 party that 'loses'". I tend to agree, either it ends up more work than expected (freelancer loses), or (although in your experience that's less common) the freelancer learned from previous mistakes and overcharges.
In addition, the upfront cost of specifying the job is also lost. This is not always trivial to 0do upfront, as both the world, insights, etc change over time (hence many have moved away from the waterfall approach).
- Spooky23 8y agoThe biggest thing is that flat rate doesn’t do is anticipate risk. If through nobody’s ill intent a task takes 5x longer or 5x less, it’s all swallowed up by the flat rate. That’s a feature for a productized service. It also works for well-scoped tasks. I wouldn’t pay someone by the hour to cut the grass.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- pointillistic 8y agoOn assumes that there is always room for additional services. And unforeseen conditions.