"If my apology to Monica seemed shallow it was because I was angry about the harm she has inflicted on others on behalf of her own agenda." This is neither an

"If my apology to Monica seemed shallow it was because I was angry about the harm she has inflicted on others on behalf of her own agenda." This is neither an a letter of apology nor an admission of wrongdoing, it's a statement of blame. "Thank you to all our readers, thanks to all our advertisers and writers... and to everyone who has been supportive and who has been a part of Cooks Source. To one writer in particular, Monica Gaudio, I wish you had given me a chance." The "one writer in particular" directly after referring to the magazine's writers almost implies that she thinks Monica is one of their writers. I wonder if she thinks that the entire Internet are her writers? I don't think that violating copyright is incurring her the wrath of the Internet. Plenty of people distribute content that isn't theirs, and usually they get sympathy when the big bad RIAA comes in. It's the fact that every time she gets called out on a mistake, she insults the victim. You can get away with being wrong or with being nasty, but not both.