6 ms·
What do you see as an issue in technical writing, if anything past not concise or well written?
by coreypreston 8y ago
What do you see as an issue in technical writing, if anything past not concise or well written?
- canada_dry 8y agoI suppose it boils down to why the Feynman lectures are generally considered a gold standard in technical presentations. His explanations focus on the most important bits (which he has skillfully prioritized based on his expert knowledge) and avoid highly domain specific nomenclature i.e. he gives a thorough-yet-concise explanation in a way that a reasonably intelligent lay person can understand. Does that make sense?
- dmix 8y agoAgreed. This is also why I adore the SICP lectures from the 1980s [1] (and the book in general). It broke programming down to its most fundamental and important building blocks without all the baggage of machine/operating system/application/dependency/etc specific stuff. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Op3QLzMgSY&list=PL8FE88AA54363BC46 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Op3QLzMgSY&list=PL8FE88AA54...
- coreypreston 8y agoThat does, thanks for sharing.
- madhadron 8y agoThe Feynman lectures are also not useful to learn physics from, so you may want to avoid that as a standard.