8 ms·
The problem is that Facebook's claiming that email is just another piece of metadata about a user. However, from Google's point of (and rest of the non-Faceboo
by miratrix 16y ago
The problem is that Facebook's claiming that email is just another piece of metadata about a user. However, from Google's point of (and rest of the non-Facebook web), email is not a metadata, but the key identifier around which all of the services know which "John Smith" the given user is.
If I'm building anything interesting and want to play outside the Facebook walled garden, the Facebook ID doesn't really get me anything - it's like someone giving me a currency from a random country that I never intend to visit.
Unfortunately, even Facebook itself treats the email address as an identifier data (what do you need to use to log in to Facebook? Email address and password). It's a little disingenuous for them to turn that around and say that it's a metadata that's part of the user's profile, as opposed to the only unique, persistent, and widely used identifier that we currently have on the web.
- chrischen 16y agoActually the facebook uid is very useful. Why else would facebook competitor.com need a friends email addresses but to spam them to sign up? If two people sign up with facebook data dumps you can still link them up via data dumps. Another useful feature is email hashed (dunno if it's still supported. But if you have someone's email you can connect compare email hashed so emails are never revealed.