6 ms·
For better or for worse this is part of the "Standard Style": https://www.npmjs.com/package/standard https://www.npmjs.com/package/standard It always seemed li
by pagnol 8y ago
For better or for worse this is part of the "Standard Style": https://www.npmjs.com/package/standard https://www.npmjs.com/package/standard
It always seemed like an odd choice to me that would make people less likely to adopt it.
- otras 8y agoImportant emphasis on the quotation marks around the word standard. From the readme: > But this isn't a real web standard! > Of course it's not! The style laid out here is not affiliated with any official web standards groups, which is why this repo is called standard/standard and not ECMA/standard. > The word "standard" has more meanings than just "web standard" :-) I’m not a fan of the naming, but I could also be biased because I disagree with some of the formatting rules.