7 ms·
Thought it'd be the syntax. Maybe next year.
by jhack 8y ago
Thought it'd be the syntax. Maybe next year.
- steveklabnik 8y agoThere are no plans to significantly change the syntax.
- zozbot123 8y agoNot as part of the official Rust project, of course. But it would be nice to see some exploration of what a "reskin" of Rust-like semantics with a different syntax could look like. Kind of like some languages, e.g. VB.NET or Nim are little more than "reskins" of others, in ways that arguably make them more intuitive than the original.
- tln 8y agoWhat language is Nim reskinning? ReasonML is a reskin (of ocaml), Nim is not
- swsieber 8y agohttps://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-first-class-support-for-compile-to-rust-languages/7610/14 https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/pre-rfc-first-class-suppor... ^^ This link is a pre rfc for adding good support for those types of things.
- afandian 8y agoWhat don't you like about it?
- grumpydba 8y agoNot the OP, but: lots of sigils. Dozens of macros. It's a huge language.