7 ms·
I’ve been using the TestFlight beta for a while now - since it was first announced - and it’s been a great experience so far. The recently added option to activ
by graystevens 8y ago
I’ve been using the TestFlight beta for a while now - since it was first announced - and it’s been a great experience so far. The recently added option to activate on-demand is great, as it means I can now force VPN for any WiFi and/or mobile data connections.
The primary niggle I came across was transferring the keys between my host and the client, however after a bit of tweaking I found it far easier to just utilise the QR codes option. For those interested, I wrote about my experiences on my blog[0]
[0] https://grh.am/2018/wireguard-setup-guide-for-ios/ https://grh.am/2018/wireguard-setup-guide-for-ios/
- mattrad 8y agoGreat write up, thank you! Looking at your blog post, it seems that once I've followed your guide, I only need to forward port 51820 from my router to the WG server. Is that correct?
- kortilla 8y agoIs your threat model that you trust your ISP for your wireguard server more than the mobile ISPs? WiFi I completely understand but 4g providers seem to be on par if not better than cable companies in the us when it comes to molesting your traffic.
- graystevens 8y agoDepends on the country I am in as to whether or not I want to VPN whilst on a mobile connection (whether that is for just having an IP in my home country or don’t fancy my traffic going over their wires). It is primarily for public and/or untrusted WiFi connections, or so that I can take packet captures of iOS applications easily without a jailbreak or connecting the phone via USB to a Mac.
- move-on-by 8y agoI also use the setting to automatically switch on when going to cellular. I use it because I have a PiHole for DNS ad blocking that I wish to continue to use when on cellular. Being on a VPN is the only way to do that on iOS.
- dunham 8y agoI installed OpenVPN on my DO box after a hotel (Legoland CA) tried to MITM Dropbox, Reddit, and a few other sites. The app/browser caught this, but it rendered them unusable. But in general, yeah I’d trust DO over Comcast or Verizon. I believe one of the US cell phone providers have been caught injecting tracking cookies into http headers in the past and selling customer information fits nicely into their business model. I tend to only use it when I’m on sketchy WiFi networks though.
- heavyset_go 8y agoThis[1] was from 2014 regarding Verizon's mobile network. [1] Verizon Injecting Perma-Cookies to Track Mobile Customers, Bypassing Privacy Controls: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/11/verizon-x-uidh https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/11/verizon-x-uidh
- 0xADEADBEE 8y agoThat's pretty much my threat model. I tunnel everything over a Digital Ocean box, where I can assume that three letter agencies have access to my traffic but be reasonably confident that my ISP isn't building up a profile on me that it may be sharing with third parties in my country like insurance companies or credit agencies. I can also roll my IP every few weeks which might assist in messing up various tracking/profiling measures. My initial concern was that it would slow down my browsing because my VPS is in another country but I haven't noticed much difference.
- sspencer 8y agoI just ran through this - works flawlessly. One peculiarity that might help someone else in my shoes: I was connecting to my VPN node through Terminal (with Solarized Dark) on OS X and generating the QR code with the suggested command but the result was a little 'off' somehow and didn't read as a QR code to my phone. By replacing 'ansiutf8' with simply 'ansi' I was able to get a smoother, readable QR code. Just a heads up in case someone else follows this excellent guide and gets the same issue - I fully blame Solarized ;)