6 ms·
If newspapers were in it for the money they wouldn't be newspapers. It's not an incredibly lucrative business.
by stupidbird 8y ago
If newspapers were in it for the money they wouldn't be newspapers. It's not an incredibly lucrative business.
- usefulcat 8y agoCorrelation != causation. The fact that most newspapers aren't lucrative doesn't mean they don't value profit.
- spac 8y agoBloomberg News is not a newspaper. The company makes money from selling terminals not news (although the terminal contains news, but it's easy to see that sensationalism is not what the customers pay for).
- usefulcat 8y agoNo one had to pay to read the SuperMicro story (the original one that started all this).
- stupidbird 8y agoSure, but they let everyone read this specific story for free. They could have easily kept it behind their paywall. Overall Bloomberg as a company does not sustain itself on news revenue.