6 ms·
Not so. I'm just saying that it's valid to disagree on the definition of a thing, and that when that happens you need to have debate about the real underlying
by Nacraile 8y ago
Not so. I'm just saying that it's valid to disagree on the definition of a thing, and that when that happens you need to have debate about the real underlying disagreement, rather than making a pointless and foolish declaration of your correctness by your definition.
Although I'm not sure why I bothered typing that, given the current readings I'm getting on my troll detector.