5 ms·
My experience with body armor is based on equipment from the 1990s so take this for what it's worth. While the bullet may not penetrate the cloth, it often res
by jackhack 8y ago
My experience with body armor is based on equipment from the 1990s so take this for what it's worth.
While the bullet may not penetrate the cloth, it often results in broken ribs and a great amount of bruising underneath. Damage to liver, spleen, lungs and heart is also possible due to the shock of impact -- that energy has to go somewhere. So even if it doesn't penetrate, you might still die. Very large handgun rounds may deform the inner surface of the vest into a cupped shape. Rifle rounds travel at much, much higher velocity and carry so much energy that they usually punch right through. That's why a plate carrier is needed to protect the heart from rifle rounds.
it's basically the same trauma as being hit in the ribs with a sledge hammer or a baseball bat, swung at full speed. You'll likely survive, but you'll almost certainly likely be injured to one degree or another. In short, it won't be pleasant.
- Bedon292 8y agoYeah, I can imagine there would be a lot of possible damage based upon the blunt force trauma. I guess they picked a spot that was least likely to do lasting internal damage?
- vorpalhex 8y agoRifle rounds pack a whole lot more power than 9mm, the flip side is that 9mm is very common. One of the original inventors of the second chance vests shot himself with a .357 point blank in front of an audience and walked away: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwBLL7Z3OvU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IwBLL7Z3OvU