Conflating bridge building with public speech is not a good analogy: one is physics, the other chaos. I do not like to see distasteful ideas put forth where i

Conflating bridge building with public speech is not a good analogy: one is physics, the other chaos. I do not like to see distasteful ideas put forth where i can see them, but what happens when our opinions on what is distasteful are in opposition? It is Gabs right to, but not a responsibility to block content they find objectionable on their platform. And the first amendment clearly defines our RIGHT (note:defines, not gives) to say whatever we want, no matter how distasteful some may think it. Edit for fumble fingers