4 ms·
Right, Scheme is used and those uses are reflected in the spec(s). The minimalism of Scheme is what makes it easier to optimize, but that's not why it's alive.
by mdhughes 8y ago
Right, Scheme is used and those uses are reflected in the spec(s). The minimalism of Scheme is what makes it easier to optimize, but that's not why it's alive.
If LISP users want their variant to stay alive as well, they need to follow that model of actually using it and documenting how it's used.
Vengeful LISP zombies gonna downvote, of course, because they're bad people.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- Jach 8y agoWhy the hostility? Since we're thinking at the level of cartoons, here's a fun one: http://kvardek-du.kerno.org/2010/01/how-common-lisp-programmer-views-users.html http://kvardek-du.kerno.org/2010/01/how-common-lisp-programm... Note the third row's distinct family orientation...
- mdhughes 8y agoI'm not hostile, riffing on a cartoon is what humans call "humor". While I have no problem with "Scheme is Spock", I'd put Captain Pike in his beeping wheelchair in the CLISP slot, and Clojure is clearly Kirk: All but married to the Enterprise. But whooo, there's some tactless stuff in those PHP and Forth slots. And Javascript's a Scotty-type lang now, it's for getting engineering done.