6 ms·
You're right. But something like this would be harder to fake: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/img/tignish/features/security-id.png http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/i
by larsu 16y ago
You're right. But something like this would be harder to fake: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/img/tignish/features/security-id.png http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/img/tignish/features/security-i...
- frio 16y agoYes and no. Mozilla's a bit screwed on this front, because they use XUL to render their interface - and, critically, the browser can render XUL pages. I don't have FF installed on this machine, but you should still be able to check it out at http://www.faser.net/mab/remote.cfm http://www.faser.net/mab/remote.cfm to see a demo of the feature. It's a pretty cool feature, but it means that on Firefox, attackers should be able to emulate basically any chrome they want to.
- LordLandon 16y agoTo demonstrate, go to chrome://browser/content/browser.xul in firefox
- sid0 16y agoRemote XUL is disabled in Firefox 4.