7 ms·
I understand the naming issue but from the look of it the extension only works locally, where's the issue with that?
by alien1993 8y ago
I understand the naming issue but from the look of it the extension only works locally, where's the issue with that?
- g3rv4 8y agothey don't want people injecting javascript on their website. That's all there's to it. I'm not sending anything anywhere. I'm not storing anything. I'm not profiting from it.
- saagarjha 8y agoBut I do this already with an ad blocker…
- byte1918 8y ago> they don't want people injecting javascript on their website They should send an email to every extension author ever, and maybe even browser vendors for supporting such a malicious feature.
- thebaer 8y ago...and then notify every ISP, every place that offers free public Wi-Fi, every airline that has Wi-Fi on their planes, anyone else who injects code into web pages...
- alien1993 8y agoDon't think they can enforce this at all, I would just change the name and call it a day. The burden is on you though, certainly no one can force you to make decisions. :)
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]