6 ms·
I don't like the naming. "Apache 2.0 with commons clause" is not the right way to describe this licensing paradigm. It is fundamentally no longer Apache 2.0. I
by mark_element 8y ago
I don't like the naming. "Apache 2.0 with commons clause" is not the right way to describe this licensing paradigm. It is fundamentally no longer Apache 2.0. I appreciate the motivation, but think it would better serve everyone to just make a new "Redis License" that describes the terms.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- incompatible 8y agoThe name is kind of implying that it's somehow related to Creative Commons. I assume the latter organization actually has nothing to do with it?
- paulddraper 8y agoYeah... I'm interested to know why they picked they been.
- bigiain 8y agoI wonder if the Apache trademark allows them to call it that? Calling your chicken "KFC with different herbs and spices!" would get you stamped down hard _very_ quickly...