6 ms·
Your ridiculous talking points are well overplayed. Let us start with the e-mails - point out where they were "damning" and where information was "falsified", h
by powerje 16y ago
Your ridiculous talking points are well overplayed. Let us start with the e-mails - point out where they were "damning" and where information was "falsified", hint: it didn't happen, you're a fish swallowing a hook.
- randallsquared 16y agoThere were several long discussions about this on this very site at the time, and many of us remember those discussions, so it's going to be difficult to spread FUD about them. Here's a pointer to a bunch of them, in case you missed the whole debacle: http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anews.ycombinator.com+climategate http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Anews.ycombinator.com+c...
- powerje 16y agoThe worst things to come out of those emails were scientist getting pissed off about idiots who kept requesting data they were legally obligated not to provide (it was proprietary, if the people wanted certain data they had to buy it themselves), the rest of the data was already freely available. If you believe anything worse than that occurred then I'm sorry you're an idiot.
- rick888 16y ago"point out where they were "damning" and where information was "falsified", hint: it didn't happen, you're a fish swallowing a hook." No, you are. You are supporting the push to take money out of your pocket to support the nonsense that is global warming (which has changed names 3 times now).
- davidj 16y agoIn the source code that they used to 'normalize' the tempatures, there was a variable named -- I kid you not -- FUDGE_FACTOR. Ha!