8 ms·
Ah, darn, I'm a few hours late so you will probably miss it but I wanted to ask for a long time: Sounds like a lot of stuff like this has accumulated. Your ded
by 101km 8y ago
Ah, darn, I'm a few hours late so you will probably miss it but I wanted to ask for a long time:
Sounds like a lot of stuff like this has accumulated. Your dedication to backwards compatibility (and testing) is always very impressive, but don't you ever get the urge to do a parallel "SQLite Next" effort as it were? Kind of like python had the 2/3 years.
- timClicks 8y agoThere was an attempt to re-architect sqlite. Try searching for sqlite4.
- okket 8y agoHere is a discussion about how the sqlite4 experiment ended, from 8 months ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15648280 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15648280 (157 comments) And the relevant commit (timestamp 2017-10-27): https://sqlite.org/src4/artifact/56683d66cbd41c2e https://sqlite.org/src4/artifact/56683d66cbd41c2e > All development work on SQLite4 has ended. The experiment has concluded. > Lessons learned from SQLite4 have been folded into SQLite3 which continues to be actively maintained and developed. This repository exists as an historical record. There are no plans at this time to resume development of SQLite4.
- tqkxzugoaupvwqr 8y agoI read somewhere that the developers of SQLite have a multi-decade support agreement with some big companies. If true, they will probably keep all the accumulated stuff. Any changes would only be additions and never break backwards compatibility.