6 ms·
> In the case of maps, there weren't many great alternatives for a long time, due to Google sucking all the oxygen/profit potential out of the field with their
by C7H8N4O2 8y ago
> In the case of maps, there weren't many great alternatives for a long time, due to Google sucking all the oxygen/profit potential out of the field with their excellent free offerings.
There was a related discussion[0] on HN a few weeks ago that I found enlightening. Commentator ucaetano's phrasing of the strategy was "create a desert of profitability around you". The discussion of moats vs deserts found here [1] is also useful.
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17047348 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17047348 "Laws of Tech Economics: Commoditize Your Complement"
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17048492 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17048492
- ucaetano 8y agoHa, that was me! Thanks for the bump!
- komali2 8y agoAlmost every conversation I've had with someone working at a startup in this city inevitably turns to the "so, are you worried Google will simply start offering your service for free?" I remember like 3 or 4 years ago having this conversation at a hackathon with a bunch of "Machine Learning" / "Sentiment Analysis" APIs present... right as google started offering both for free on their cloud platform.
- ucaetano 8y agoWhich most likely meant the startup was a feature or a product, not a company with a viable business model.
- imron 8y agoBeing bought/aquihired by Google/others seems to be a business model several companies aim for.
- hueving 8y agoGmail is free. Does that mean email service is not a product? Why does fastmail exist?
- worble 8y agoWhat it actually means is that google has more money, so they can muscle their way in with cheap/free offerings that are as good or better as the competition, kill it and then hike prices.
- Scarblac 8y agoIf it wasn't a viable business model, Google wouldn't move into the space. It's just that they first use their infinite pocket money to kill off all the competition, then switch to making money.
- ucaetano 8y ago> If it wasn't a viable business model, Google wouldn't move into the space. Wrong, maybe that "space" (feature or product) goes well with Google's business model, but wouldn't support a viable business mode by itself.
- oblio 8y agoThis is funny: Paul Graham, September 2001: > "And if you manage to write something that takes off, you may find that you were merely doing market research for Microsoft.” Google is today's Microsoft :)