4 ms·
Incorrect again. The fact that you can go onto any apps review history and see evidence that people are unhappy with updates that break their stuff is exactly t
by hungerstrike 8y ago
Incorrect again. The fact that you can go onto any apps review history and see evidence that people are unhappy with updates that break their stuff is exactly the definition of empirical evidence.
Sorry, but none of your badly formed, hand-wavy reasoning has proven that wrong. Also, nobody is arguing that "the majority" think something - I'm arguing against your completely anecdotal and un-evidenced claim that it "rarely" happens.
What evidence do you have that it rarely happens? None that I can see so far...
- waivek 8y agoHow can app reviews be used to draw conclusions of how users feel about the app if less than ten percent of the users write app reviews? It's like surveying a small percentage of an electorate by asking them who they'll vote for for and deciding the result based on the survey.
- hungerstrike 8y agoActually, 10% of a population is a damn good sample size for just about any scientific or medical study. It’s quite large to be honest. Anyway, once again... where is your evidence that this rarely happens?
- waivek 8y agoIt's a biased sample because people who are fine with their app don't write reviews. The sample is polluted. My evidence can drawn from the fact that ten percent of people write reviews. A fraction of that are negative. If an occurrence happens say five out of a hundred times,that's a rare occurrence.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- hungerstrike 8y agoHahahahaaaaa. So, the same evidence that was not good enough for you is now good enough for you. That’s hilarious! Thanks for a good laugh :) Listen, you’re dead wrong. Sorry.
- waivek 8y agoI'm using your evidence to prove my point as that is a source you seem to believe. What do you get from laughing at other people? EDIT: Your reply has been flagged which is not something I wanted. I do have evidence, yours.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- hungerstrike 8y agoYou've got no evidence and your logic regarding sample sizes is unsound. 10% is a huge sample size for any survey. Look at how it's calculated - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination or just plug in your numbers here - https://www.checkmarket.com/sample-size-calculator/ https://www.checkmarket.com/sample-size-calculator/ EDIT: Someone is also flagging or downvoting your comments. Not me. Where is your evidence for anything that you’ve said? Where is your evidence that it's polluted?
- waivek 8y agoI understand ten percent is a huge sample. But it's a polluted one. That's all I'm saying.
- hungerstrike 8y agoOK and all I’m saying is that you have not presented any evidence for your claim at all.