7 ms·

ML5js: Friendly machine learning for the web

161 points by 3laab 8y ago

entropie 8y ago
This breaks my chrome. I see the site. Cant click anything and a popup "Wait for page". > Version 66.0.3355.0 (Official Build) dev (64-bit)
- carlosgg 8y ago
  Works ok here... Version 66.0.3359.181 (Official Build) (64-bit)
foxfired 8y ago
I uploaded a few pictures and here is what I got. Portrait pictures of myself: * academic gown, academic robe, judge's robe 38.01% confidence. * Band Aid 88.27% confidence. * Prison 42.74% confidence. * Wool, 11% confidence Moving on to Random stuff: - Linkedin Logo -> Hair Spray - Washington Monument -> Pole - Abraham Lincoln Statue -> Altar - Dragon Fly -> Kite - Sun Glasses -> Car Mirror - Mushroom -> Mushroom!!!!!! - Lipstick -> Lipstick !!!
- madeofpalk 8y ago
  Heh. It told me it was 70% sure I was a rhinoceros beetle
  - amelius 8y ago
    It could be that there's a beetle in the picture somewhere.
    - Boulth 8y ago
      On the internet nobody knows you're a beetle.
goatlover 8y ago
* Ruby Logo with PL text => Digital Clock 23.71% confidence * Rails Logo => iPod 20.63% * Histogram Chart => Crossword Puzzle 65.94% * JS code in Sublime => Book Jacket 16.68% * Toy Robot Goat => Assault Rifle 21.79% * Thanos flexing gauntlet from movie => Pickelhaube 25.71%.
52-6F-62 8y ago
Not bad! Uploaded some photos: * Macro of Gerbera >> Daisy 99.5% Confidence * Dark shot of bookshelf >> Bookshelf 98.12% Confidence * Photo of a lake at Hokkaido with Mt Fuji behind >> Lakeside, lakeshore 79.62% Confidence * Flatiron mountains Colorado >> Alp 96.61% Confidence * Trinity College Library Dublin >> Library 92.27% Confidence But then: * Milky way >> Velvet 31.37% * Field back home >> megalith, megalithic structure 29.47% * Earth at night from space station >> Nematode, nematode worm, roundworm 76.63% Still. It's quick
- projectramo 8y ago
  What was the resolution of the picture of earth? Maybe it picked up a roundworm on the surface.
  - 52-6F-62 8y ago
    You never know.... But in seriousness 2048x1365 - https://ibb.co/ifGzcy https://ibb.co/ifGzcy It's night over Toronto from the station with lights glowing. I imagine it got it from that or something. I think it was a Canadian Space Agency photo, but I can't remember the exact source/which astronaut.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
invalidusernam3 8y ago
Pretty good, this one made me laugh https://i.imgur.com/kZr5kPL.png https://i.imgur.com/kZr5kPL.png
bsbechtel 8y ago
Many comments here are sharing their results from using the examples. It's important to keep in mind the examples are trained on datasets that may or may not include data on the examples you are uploading, which means random images or words not included in the training data sets will likely return bad results. Please keep this in mind when judging the quality of the library....the data you use to train the model affects the quality of your results.
thecrazyone 8y ago
This deserves way more attention. I thought this would be blowing up HN, but eh, tumbleweed here! Is there some reason the HN community isn't too gung-ho about this? Is it because it's in the browser or is it javascript or that it's too high level (vs low level details). I'm completely Stumped by this response.

161 points by 3laab 8y ago

This breaks my chrome. I see the site. Cant click anything and a popup "Wait for page". > Version 66.0.3355.0 (Official Build) dev (64-bit)

carlosgg 8y ago
Works ok here... Version 66.0.3359.181 (Official Build) (64-bit)

foxfired 8y ago

I uploaded a few pictures and here is what I got. Portrait pictures of myself: * academic gown, academic robe, judge's robe 38.01% confidence. * Band Aid 88.27% confidence. * Prison 42.74% confidence. * Wool, 11% confidence Moving on to Random stuff: - Linkedin Logo -> Hair Spray - Washington Monument -> Pole - Abraham Lincoln Statue -> Altar - Dragon Fly -> Kite - Sun Glasses -> Car Mirror - Mushroom -> Mushroom!!!!!! - Lipstick -> Lipstick !!!

madeofpalk 8y ago
Heh. It told me it was 70% sure I was a rhinoceros beetle
- amelius 8y ago
  It could be that there's a beetle in the picture somewhere.
  - Boulth 8y ago
    On the internet nobody knows you're a beetle.

goatlover 8y ago

* Ruby Logo with PL text => Digital Clock 23.71% confidence * Rails Logo => iPod 20.63% * Histogram Chart => Crossword Puzzle 65.94% * JS code in Sublime => Book Jacket 16.68% * Toy Robot Goat => Assault Rifle 21.79% * Thanos flexing gauntlet from movie => Pickelhaube 25.71%.

52-6F-62 8y ago

Not bad! Uploaded some photos: * Macro of Gerbera >> Daisy 99.5% Confidence * Dark shot of bookshelf >> Bookshelf 98.12% Confidence * Photo of a lake at Hokkaido with Mt Fuji behind >> Lakeside, lakeshore 79.62% Confidence * Flatiron mountains Colorado >> Alp 96.61% Confidence * Trinity College Library Dublin >> Library 92.27% Confidence But then: * Milky way >> Velvet 31.37% * Field back home >> megalith, megalithic structure 29.47% * Earth at night from space station >> Nematode, nematode worm, roundworm 76.63% Still. It's quick

projectramo 8y ago
What was the resolution of the picture of earth? Maybe it picked up a roundworm on the surface.
- 52-6F-62 8y ago
  You never know.... But in seriousness 2048x1365 - https://ibb.co/ifGzcy https://ibb.co/ifGzcy It's night over Toronto from the station with lights glowing. I imagine it got it from that or something. I think it was a Canadian Space Agency photo, but I can't remember the exact source/which astronaut.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

invalidusernam3 8y ago

Pretty good, this one made me laugh https://i.imgur.com/kZr5kPL.png https://i.imgur.com/kZr5kPL.png

bsbechtel 8y ago

Many comments here are sharing their results from using the examples. It's important to keep in mind the examples are trained on datasets that may or may not include data on the examples you are uploading, which means random images or words not included in the training data sets will likely return bad results. Please keep this in mind when judging the quality of the library....the data you use to train the model affects the quality of your results.

thecrazyone 8y ago

This deserves way more attention. I thought this would be blowing up HN, but eh, tumbleweed here! Is there some reason the HN community isn't too gung-ho about this? Is it because it's in the browser or is it javascript or that it's too high level (vs low level details). I'm completely Stumped by this response.