Note that the USPTO is asking for comments on how it should comply with the Bilski decision, not for rants about software patents in general. Your comments wil

Note that the USPTO is asking for comments on how it should comply with the Bilski decision, not for rants about software patents in general. Your comments will presumably carry more weight if you can explain why many software patents have more in common with business methods than with machines or transformations. This looks like a good place to start: http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Bilski:_analysis_of_Supreme_Court_decision http://en.swpat.org/wiki/Bilski:_analysis_of_Supreme_Court_d...