6 ms·
You can't set classic themes on Win 10 with latest updates. So annoying. The few attempts out there for themes that used a cracked themer just aren't the same a
by rorso 8y ago
You can't set classic themes on Win 10 with latest updates. So annoying. The few attempts out there for themes that used a cracked themer just aren't the same and are standard Win 10 with colours/menu colours changed.
I'd love a FULL faithful Win 98 theme for current Win 10. I'm 100% aware it's mostly my own personal nostalgia rather than it being "better", but it's absolutely ridiculous that you can no longer fully theme Windows and they actively block themeing from working properly now.
I'm pretty close to leaving Windows for good (having used it since the start, faithfully through thick and thin) and switching to Mint or some such, just so I can set stuff up how I want to. Windows 10 is the most dumbed down, ugly, and confusing OS Microsoft has ever put out (recently overtaking Vista for me for annoyances).
- megaman22 8y ago1.) If you can get it, LTSB is your friend. 2.) Classic Shell is mandatory. How you could break the start menu search as profiundly as Windows 10 does is baffling.
- elaus 8y agoRegarding the second point: I really don't get what's up with the start menu search. I don't use Win 10 all that often (secondary OS) and always assumed it's somehow broken for me. I almost never find anything I'm looking for and it feels absolutely ridiculous.
- woodrowbarlow 8y agowhat? so it's not just me? i assumed that it stopped working after i went ballistic in the privacy and telemetry sections of the control panel.
- zeusk 8y ago2.) It isn't just Windows, Mac has done it too; Try this in spotlight: 'vsc' will show Visual Studio Code 'vsco' will show a web search of 'vscode extensions' and Visual Studio Code nowhere to be seen 'xc' will show Xcode 'xco' will show Xcode Server Builder
- makecheck 8y agoIt’s one thing to rank results differently as you type but I can’t comprehend how entire results go away when they still should match as you continue.
- gnode 8y ago> it's mostly my own personal nostalgia rather than it being "better" I believe from a UX standpoint the win95 UI was better. Microsoft did a lot of actual usability research in evolving the UI of Windows 3.1 into that of 95. Moving forward I believe they compromised on usability in favour of a more "sexy" minimalist aesthetic. A particularly good example is the 3D of the old UI contrasted to modern flat UIs provides far more obvious hierarchy and hinting of what can be interacted with and in what way.
- forgotmypw 8y agoI don't think it's just nostalgia. I personally prefer for an interface to be as invisible as possible, which to me means flat gray or dark gray. Anything else like color, reflections, transparency, animations, etc. draw my attention away from what I'm doing (contained within the window frames) out into the window frames and taskbar, which I want to look at as little as necessary.