6 ms·
None, until you equip the dog with an AI that decides on its own when to kill people. I am pretty sure this is what the OP meant.
by erw1 8y ago
None, until you equip the dog with an AI that decides on its own when to kill people. I am pretty sure this is what the OP meant.
- lbenes 8y agoHackers like George Hotz can and have decided to equip their cars with AI.[1] Again, how is this any different? [1] https://www.theverge.com/2017/7/7/15933554/george-hotz-hacking-self-driving-cars-comma-ai https://www.theverge.com/2017/7/7/15933554/george-hotz-hacki... People are hacking on everything from micro-drones to full sized cars. Why single out this platform? Explosive on drones or automated weapons on cars could all be misused.
- TheOtherHobbes 8y agoIn this context "People are hacking everything" is not entirely reassuring.
- erw1 8y agoYou really have no problem with a George Hotz purchasing a bot, soldering guns to it, installing some form of AI that controls the trigger, and then letting it loose into the world? Seems a bit irresponsible. But to answer you questions about the legality all this - I don't know. Tesla and Uber are putting autopilots in their cars. Is that legal? Apparently, it is. Yet, those autopilots are already killing people. So expect a regulatory backlash, once enough people die. I hope it won't take a massacre perpetrated by a buggy AI with a gun to get us there.