6 ms·
He wasn't charged with trademark infringement, so its irrelevant. If he had removed the logos entirely they still would have sent him to jail. And that's the pr
by Houshalter 8y ago
He wasn't charged with trademark infringement, so its irrelevant. If he had removed the logos entirely they still would have sent him to jail. And that's the precedent they've set to anyone who might want to try this in the future.
- carussell 8y agoDo you actually know this, or like most commenters here, was your introduction to this case the Washington Post that everyone else read?