4 ms·
Step 1: Do everything until you can't. Step 2: Pick the one thing you do the worst. Hire one person (probably a part-time contractor) to do that. Step 3: Do e
by scolson 8y ago
Step 1: Do everything until you can't.
Step 2: Pick the one thing you do the worst. Hire one person (probably a part-time contractor) to do that.
Step 3: Do everything else until you can't.
Step 4: Goto "Step 2"
- k__ 8y agoIf you hire someone to do stufd you are bad at, you often end up in being unable to tell if they do it well
- goatherders 8y agoThat's ridiculous. People hire accountants, lawyers, and doctors all the time.
- millzlane 8y agoI see op's logic. How would you know when or if they did a poor job? Would it be after your audit, your guilty verdict, or the malpractice claim?
- k__ 8y agoJust look at marketing and sales. It's basically a lottery...
- _vn5r 8y agoMaybe can be changed to "Use your network to find..." Hopefully referrals are a bit better than lottery
- narag 8y agoFor any task you should be able to find information to teach yourself at least basic monitoring. If you can't get good at doing it, you can at least be reasonably good to judge if it's working.
- RandomBK 8y agoAccountants, lawyers, and doctors all have associations who set professional standards they must abide by. They often also owe you a higher duty of care than someone in i.e. marketing or sales. I still see where op is going, but accountants, lawyers, and doctors aren't the greatest counterexamples to use here.
- staticautomatic 8y agoSure they are. There's plenty of variation in quality among people in those respective fields, just like every professional field.