5 ms·
How about a source that disproves it entirely instead? https://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_q145.html https://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_q145.html
by ConcernedCoder 8y ago
How about a source that disproves it entirely instead?
https://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_q145.html https://www.usconstitution.net/constfaq_q145.html
- chimeracoder 8y ago> How about a source that disproves it entirely instead? As pointed out in your link, the copy in the National Archives isn't written on hemp, but the first drafts of the Constitution - ie, as it was literally being written - likely were. OP misstated it slightly, or in a way that's a bit misleading, but it's not incorrect.
- TheSpiceIsLife 8y agoMaybe the grand-parent meant the people who wrote the constitution were stoned.