7 ms·
>First, do you or anyone you know directly or indirectly profit from these types of services? Of course. No one would be using them if they weren't better off
by ancap 9y ago
>First, do you or anyone you know directly or indirectly profit from these types of services?
Of course. No one would be using them if they weren't better off from using them.
- s73v3r_ 9y agoThe idea that people are perfectly rational actors with perfect information has long since been debunked.
- ancap 9y agoSure people are rational, even though you as an external actor may not agree with their motives. Even a schizophrenic is rational given what they have to work with. I'm not sure what perfect information has to do with anything. It's impossible that perfect information could ever exist.
- s73v3r_ 9y agoNo, they're not. They're people. They do not act perfectly rational.
- ancap 9y ago> They do not act perfectly rational. I suppose you have your own definition for "perfectly rational" that you're standing by, and that's fine. But I fail to see the point. How is that relevant to this thread? I originally posted that people wouldn't use these web services if they didn't receive some benefit from it, and you've done nothing more than present red herrings.
- walterstucco 9y agoCounter points: heroin, gambling, alcohol Exploiting addiction is not exactly good