7 ms·
Couldn't they just use multiple fibers per display to get around that problem?
by alakin 9y ago
Couldn't they just use multiple fibers per display to get around that problem?
- kguttag 9y agoThe parallel fiber idea is "optically silly" but it takes some understanding of light to prove it is impossible too. It is yet another example of trying to fool people. I did try and explain this before on my blog over a year ago. See http://www.kguttag.com/2016/11/20/magic-leap-separating-magi.. http://www.kguttag.com/2016/11/20/magic-leap-separating-magi.... and scroll down to the Appendix at the bottom. Basically you have multiple fibers going in a circle each with their center of origin it becomes impossible to get them to act like a single image for use in near eye optic. What the layman would not understand is that this is very different from image stitching on a projection screen that in part relies on the light being diffused/randomized by the screen. In the case of near eye optics, there is no way to get the multiple projector image collimated AND seamlessly put together. It is yet another example of a good con has to seem believable.
- klibertp 9y agoYou shouldn't repost literally the same comment you already posted up thread. If you don't want to rehash the same content in different words, you should just paste a link to the previous comment.