5 ms·
Right. Sure, you could cache it. I will give you that. But you have to index the entire internet for it to be interesting to anyone. The first Google did that.
by electic 9y ago
Right. Sure, you could cache it. I will give you that. But you have to index the entire internet for it to be interesting to anyone. The first Google did that. It indexed most of the pages out there.
Why? Because the instant I search once, twice, three times and find nothing. I am abandoning the system.
Blockchain aside, it doesn't matter. Whatever system you build has to be 10x better than the current system. Nothing you have said, blockchain usage included, comes close to getting there.
- Nuzzerino 9y agoNothing I have said comes close to being 10x better because I have not posted any design specs, proposals, or pitches for such a system. I certainly can't beat Google by 10x with some offhanded comments which were not the point of the original post. But some of the misinformation you are spreading about blockchain technologies contributes to the negative sentiment seen around here, and it had to be addressed.
- always_good 9y agoTo me your posts come off as the hand-wavy "just sprinkle in some blockchain magic!" sentiment that is the main cause of blockchain eye-rolling on HN, not the person putting you in the position of elaboration.
- Nuzzerino 9y agoMr. Gupta asked, in a respectable and direct manner, for me to elaborate. And I did. You, and many of the posters here, did not ask nicely. So I did not. https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-to-beat-Google/answer/Mark-Nuzzolilo-II/comment/50986907 https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-to-beat-Google/answer/M...
- chillee 9y agoNot surprised it's a "blockchain" developer advocating for how easy it is to dethrone Google.
- Nuzzerino 9y agoElectic (the top commenter, not the OP) is the blockchain developer.