5 ms·
There's not much to discuss regarding morals in this article, but I really can't stand justifications or "explanations" such as this: > ...overwhelmingly male
by devdad 9y ago
There's not much to discuss regarding morals in this article, but I really can't stand justifications or "explanations" such as this:
> ...overwhelmingly male and requiring long, lonely hours on computers, has more avid consumers of prostitution than many other fields.
Mens' urges are not out of control. We are not werewolves that transform into savage beasts and get to justify buying other human beings just because we feel lonely and need physical contact.
- friedButter 9y agoIs it inherently bad to pay for sex in your opinion?
- owebmaster 9y agoI'd add: it isn't bad to sell sex for money?
- owebmaster 9y agoWomen urges are not out of control too (or actually, both genders "lose" control often). They are not protectless objects that need to sell themselves to have a good life.
- devdad 9y agoDid you read the article? It states that the women selling sex in this case are victims of trafficking.
- owebmaster 9y agoDid you read my comment? Prostitutes are not victims.
- devdad 9y agoYou actually claim that women selling sex through trafficking channels are doing so out of free will?
- owebmaster 9y agoAre we talking about slavery so? Are you sure you want to call it that way? 9 out of 10 prostitutes would laugh at your face
- PrimHelios 9y agoThe article was specifically talking about sex trafficking victims. Sex trafficking victims aren't doing it willingly, they are sex slaves, not prostitutes.
- PrimHelios 9y agoSo if someone kidnaps you, beats you daily to break your will, and then starts letting men rape you for money, you aren't a victim?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]