7 ms·
I'm not sure if you're trying to imply that Lightning Network is vaporware, but there are currently three implementations that pass the integration tests: http
by jerdfelt 9y ago
I'm not sure if you're trying to imply that Lightning Network is vaporware, but there are currently three implementations that pass the integration tests:
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd
https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning
https://github.com/ACINQ/eclair https://github.com/ACINQ/eclair
https://cdecker.github.io/lightning-integration/ https://cdecker.github.io/lightning-integration/
- Cyberdog 9y agoOh, please. You and the other replier knew what I meant by "implemented."
- SmellyGeekBoy 9y ago"Code written and passing integration tests" seems like a pretty typical definition to me..?
- peoplewindow 9y agoBy that definition I've implemented a search engine, several video games and many other projects that never launched. Lightning Network has not launched, in the sense of, it is not being used by the community it was designed for. And it never will.
- homakov 9y agoNot vaporware but vaporidea. They never solved incentive model to open channel so it is more like real software no one will touch.
- StavrosK 9y agoWhat's the problem with the channel-opening incentives? I'm out of that loop, I'm afraid.