7 ms·

Is anyone else left scratching their head at how the facebook login overtook OpenID?

ydant 16y ago
Nope, it makes perfect sense to me. Open ID made no sense to non-computer enthusiasts (and to plenty of the enthusiasts as well). Those same people all have Facebook accounts and probably visit Facebook multiple times a day. They trust Facebook, so clicking on it seems painless - and it's definitely effortless.
- tomjen3 16y ago
  It doesn't make sense: everybody who have a Facebook login also have a gmail, so why not not just allow people to login with that?
  - gxti 16y ago
    Stackoverflow does exactly that. They have big buttons for all the major identity providers, including Google, Facebook, etc. and a text field at the bottom for manual openid login.
    - sabj 16y ago
      Personally I feel a lot better about Twitter + OAuth than FB, but that's just me. As for why not use OpenID? Personally, I don't want to tie my Gmail account to a lot of things -- then people have my email! I don't necessarily want to tie my Facebook to them, either, but in the same breath some forms of OpenID can end up sharing more, depending... This is why I get cranky when people implement Disqus, too -- old comments I made that were supposed to be anonymous but which had my email for the author, etc, are now pulled in and linked to a general identity months or years later. :(
      - theBobMcCormick 16y ago
        Why would you feel better about Twitter + OAuth than FaceBook + OAuth (which is what the sign on component of FB Connect is)? From a technology perspective, it's the same protocol. Neither company has a good security track record. (not criticizing BTW, just curious)
        desigooner 16y ago
        the twitter account could be a throwaway account and generally lesser risk of anybody getting too many personal details.. facebook, not so much ..
  - benologist 16y ago
    Because all the major sites/companies were too busy fighting to be the provider everyone uses and never got around to actually accepting anyone else.
    - tomjen3 16y ago
      But that isn't really an issue if you want to accept open ids on your site - it is actually a good thing, because the more providers there are the easier it is to find on that has your customers.
petervandijck 16y ago
It was easier to understand (openwhat?) and use (less clicks).

ydant 16y ago

Nope, it makes perfect sense to me. Open ID made no sense to non-computer enthusiasts (and to plenty of the enthusiasts as well). Those same people all have Facebook accounts and probably visit Facebook multiple times a day. They trust Facebook, so clicking on it seems painless - and it's definitely effortless.

tomjen3 16y ago
It doesn't make sense: everybody who have a Facebook login also have a gmail, so why not not just allow people to login with that?
- gxti 16y ago
  Stackoverflow does exactly that. They have big buttons for all the major identity providers, including Google, Facebook, etc. and a text field at the bottom for manual openid login.
  - sabj 16y ago
    Personally I feel a lot better about Twitter + OAuth than FB, but that's just me. As for why not use OpenID? Personally, I don't want to tie my Gmail account to a lot of things -- then people have my email! I don't necessarily want to tie my Facebook to them, either, but in the same breath some forms of OpenID can end up sharing more, depending... This is why I get cranky when people implement Disqus, too -- old comments I made that were supposed to be anonymous but which had my email for the author, etc, are now pulled in and linked to a general identity months or years later. :(
    - theBobMcCormick 16y ago
      Why would you feel better about Twitter + OAuth than FaceBook + OAuth (which is what the sign on component of FB Connect is)? From a technology perspective, it's the same protocol. Neither company has a good security track record. (not criticizing BTW, just curious)
      - desigooner 16y ago
        the twitter account could be a throwaway account and generally lesser risk of anybody getting too many personal details.. facebook, not so much ..
- benologist 16y ago
  Because all the major sites/companies were too busy fighting to be the provider everyone uses and never got around to actually accepting anyone else.
  - tomjen3 16y ago
    But that isn't really an issue if you want to accept open ids on your site - it is actually a good thing, because the more providers there are the easier it is to find on that has your customers.

petervandijck 16y ago

It was easier to understand (openwhat?) and use (less clicks).