It’s hard to see the value here of dynamic linking vs static linking, especially when it seems like a lot of the value is compile-time selection of implementati

It’s hard to see the value here of dynamic linking vs static linking, especially when it seems like a lot of the value is compile-time selection of implementations and lightweight utility code—not exactly a huge attack vector you’d want to be able to upgrade independently. And of course it introduces dependency hell, which seems like a poor fit for a library without a consistent ABI.