5 ms·
Personally I'm not impressed with the quality of the lossy encoding, it's not enough of a improvement on JPEG to make it worthwhile, for lossless however it's t
by gribbly 9y ago
Personally I'm not impressed with the quality of the lossy encoding, it's not enough of a improvement on JPEG to make it worthwhile, for lossless however it's the best format I know of right now, compresses MUCH better than PNG, and both compression and decompression is MUCH faster.
FLIF compresses better than webp, but it also compresses/decompresses more slowly, and the difference in size is quite small so overall for lossless compression, WebP is my choice.
- JyrkiAlakuijala 9y agoOh, thank you!! Music to my ears! I designed the WebP lossless format. Our most recent effort PIK tries to achieve the same in the lossy world that WebP lossless has done in the lossless coding -- a practical, efficient, fast and simple compromise.
- gribbly 9y agoYou're welcome, and huge thanks for WebP. PIK had flown under my radar, looks really interesting. Any estimate of when a first release will be out ?