7 ms·
> But, I'm kinda baffled why anyone would volunteer to provide free labor to one of the largest and most profitable companies in the world. YES! MacOS users do
by notalaser 9y ago
> But, I'm kinda baffled why anyone would volunteer to provide free labor to one of the largest and most profitable companies in the world.
YES! MacOS users don't need to document macOS as a volunteer project, they need to demand Apple to give them their money's worth.
- fnord123 9y agoAnd yet Apple does not contribute to homebrew at all. The one project that makes osx usable for developers.
- wbl 9y agoThey did contribute to Macports which does the same.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- krrrh 9y agoiirc, they actually contacted Max Howell (creator of homebrew) and got his input on how to make command line tools work better for developers and homebrew specifically.
- pjmlp 9y agoI used OS X a few times for iOS development, never used homebrew. Am I not a developer?
- khedoros1 9y agoMaybe you had different requirements than other developers. Or maybe you've got a lower bar for considering something "usable".
- pjmlp 9y agoMy requirements were those that any OS X and iOS developer have, which don't require UNIX CLI rather XCode tooling, and are happy to use any UNIX certified POSIX system for the occasional CLI automation of OS X and iOS development. Now those that bought OS X as a pretty alternative to GNU/Linux and *BSD, for development that should actually be done on those systems, might miss something like homebrew. Apparently only those are developers on HN speak.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- khedoros1 9y agoInteresting definitions. Theirs excludes you as an OSX developer, and yours excludes them as OSX developers. How about: Your requirements weren't those of "any OS X and iOS developer", unless you apply a "no true Scotsman" argument. Similarly, a nicer CLI environment is only applicable to some styles of dev on OSX.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- pjmlp 9y agoOS X is a certified UNIX, no need for external tooling.