> "human-readable" file sizes). Nothing is more human readable than "123,456,789", so I think the problem is just the way you go about making them human readab

> "human-readable" file sizes). Nothing is more human readable than "123,456,789", so I think the problem is just the way you go about making them human readable. I couldn't agree more that lurching between B, kB, MB, and GB just because the file size changes it extremely jarring and disconcerting, and actually makes comparing the size much more difficult.