5 ms·
I don't see any clever way to make that more readable. I would have to break it into two subexpressions and then take the difference. i.e. (setv e0 (-> (+
by mthomas 9y ago
I don't see any clever way to make that more readable. I would have to break it into two subexpressions and then take the difference. i.e.
(setv e0 (-> (+ 1 3 88) (/ 2)))
(setv e1 (-> (+ 3 2) (* 8)))
(setv result (- e0 e1))
- kazinator 9y agoBTW doesn't setv support multiple pairs? (setv e0 (-> (+ 1 3 88) (/ 2))) e1 (-> (+ 3 2) (* 8)) result (- e0 e1)) like setq and setf in CL.