>The real question seems to be legally whether BCH is a gift to those owning BTC or those possessing it. In Bch is not a gift. Who should have gifted it? Who i

>The real question seems to be legally whether BCH is a gift to those owning BTC or those possessing it. In Bch is not a gift. Who should have gifted it? Who is the previous owner? How did the previous owner aquire it? It is a "fructus" of btc. And that belongs to the owner. This right can be signed away, with life estate or usufructus. But that's a big deal. That can't be somewho implied in a sentence hidden somewhere in a long ToS.