5 ms·
Would love to see a better source. - Nutritionfacts.org is non-profit - Their conclusions are based on studies. - They're not trying to sell supplements or foo
by felixchan 9y ago
Would love to see a better source.
- Nutritionfacts.org is non-profit
- Their conclusions are based on studies.
- They're not trying to sell supplements or food products.
Do they omit certain studies that contradict their overall conclusions? Sure. That doesn't mean anything to me.
- Danihan 9y ago>Do they omit certain studies that contradict their overall conclusions? Sure. That doesn't mean anything to me. Cherry-picking doesn't mean anything to you?
- loeg 9y ago> Would love to see a better source. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Iron-HealthProfessional/ https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/Iron-HealthProfessional/ > - Nutritionfacts.org is non-profit - Their conclusions are based on studies. - They're not trying to sell supplements or food products. IMO: Your website is trying to sell a lifestyle. Their conclusions are made in advance; then they attempt to rationalize them with studies after the fact. > Do they omit certain studies that contradict their overall conclusions? Sure. That doesn't mean anything to me. That is a major red flag in science reporting.