6 ms·
Why are we to assume this is a bad thing, or that it is even something that won't be sorted out by natural selection?
by bcg1 9y ago
Why are we to assume this is a bad thing, or that it is even something that won't be sorted out by natural selection?
- nashashmi 9y agoI'm upset with your question. Technology is moving faster than the pace of evolution! We know very little of how evolution works to be certain we will adapt. Besides, why are you so keen on rendering the people who were not born before the age of current tech as a class unfit in our current context?
- rustynails 9y agoYou're upset with the question? That thought process is at odds with knowledge seeking. Why not ask the question? What ever happened to discussion? Good discussion can come from bad ideas. I think it's a good question and I loosely answered it elsewhere in this thread.
- samdoidge 9y agoWhy would you not assume this is a bad thing? Sperm are needed for the survival of our species; a significant drop will cause problems to that survival, a drop to zero will cause extinction.
- ak39 9y agoIt's not about just the number of sperms males produce. It is about the most crucial male hormone: testosterone. It's strange that the article doesn't speak about it. If you read up on the importance of healthy testosterone levels in both males and females you'll see why we should all be very worried about disrupting that endocrine balance.