6 ms·
That doesn't seem like a lot of money, especially for a capital intensive industry with notoriously low margins.
by spcelzrd 9y ago
That doesn't seem like a lot of money, especially for a capital intensive industry with notoriously low margins.
- 2_listerine_pls 9y ago> notoriously low margins. Some of those trucking companies take 10%. What are you talking about?
- nevir 9y agoFreight brokerages typically have margins around 15% https://www.quora.com/What-kind-of-margins-can-non-asset-based-freight-logistics-providers-expect https://www.quora.com/What-kind-of-margins-can-non-asset-bas...
- jobu 9y agoShipping is only capital intensive if you intend to own the trucks, trains, or ships. Convoy appears to be more of a middleman between owner-operator truckers and shippers or manufacturers. The problem is that many (most?) of the truckers that own their own rig are middle-aged and older, and getting them to use technology like this may be an uphill battle: “I think they’re relying too much on computers,” said Brian Larocque, a new driver based out of Connecticut.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- jbeales 9y agoYes on both. I work in tech that services the trucking industry. Getting drivers, (and dispatchers, actually), to truly trust a computer is difficult. They use a lot of apps, but trucking's got a strong culture of self-reliance, and people working in trucking probably care more about single points-of-failure than DevOps do, relying on Convoy would be a pretty big single point of failure, so they'll have to prove themselves worthy of the trust. However, 82 million should get them there. That's a ton of money to build a business with no capital costs. The big risk for them is the incumbents deciding to move quickly - most of them have the cash, so if they realize their business model is threatened by Convoy, they'll move quickly, and be supported by their existing cash flow.