6 ms·
Redux is not an implementation of Flux. These two blog posts explain the main differences: https://code-cartoons.com/a-cartoon-guide-to-flux-6157355ab207 https:
by moretti 9y ago
Redux is not an implementation of Flux.
These two blog posts explain the main differences:
https://code-cartoons.com/a-cartoon-guide-to-flux-6157355ab207 https://code-cartoons.com/a-cartoon-guide-to-flux-6157355ab2...
https://code-cartoons.com/a-cartoon-intro-to-redux-3afb775501a6 https://code-cartoons.com/a-cartoon-intro-to-redux-3afb77550...
- danesparza 9y agoI stand corrected. Thanks for these posts!
- acemarke 9y agoRedux absolutely _is_ an implementation of the Flux Architecture. I've described it as "Flux taken to its logical conclusion". If you read my post "The Tao of Redux, Part 1 - Implementation and Intent" [0], I quote several comments and pieces of early documentation that back up Redux's Flux heritage. Redux inherited the idea of plain action objects with a `type` field, action creators, and the concept of "dispatching" [0] http://blog.isquaredsoftware.com/2017/05/idiomatic-redux-tao-of-redux-part-1/ http://blog.isquaredsoftware.com/2017/05/idiomatic-redux-tao...