7 ms·
> I fail to see how showing links to search results pages from other companies in response to a product query is better for consumers than just showing them a l
by denis1 9y ago
> I fail to see how showing links to search results pages from other companies in response to a product query is better for consumers than just showing them a listing of the products they actually searched for.
But that is not what google does. I just did a search for "samsung galaxy s8". Instead of the first result being a link to a Samsung page I got 3 results that where ads (one of them being for the new oneplus). How does that match the "show what people searched for"? The results where sorted by "how much money did google receive" instead of "what the user intended".
- Ajedi32 9y agoThat's not what I get at all: https://i.imgur.com/nKpAYKX.png https://i.imgur.com/nKpAYKX.png Regardless of what you're seeing though, ads are a necessary part of Google Search; it's how they make their money. IMO it's a little strange to be complaining that Google is showing you ads in your search results.
- denis1 9y agoI mean, I don't expect Google to show the same results to everyone (this is what I get: http://imgur.com/a/go3pU http://imgur.com/a/go3pU ). Funny thing is that the results changed between my first and second query (there was another unrelated result before the first link to Samsung). I'm not complaining about ads and this fine is not about ads. It is about Google favoring Google Shopping links instead of competitors even though Google Shopping was inferior when it started. Google basically pushed their product no matter how shitty it was. If it were not for Google being a near monopoly in search this would not be a problem, but Google is a monopoly, so special rules apply to them.
- Ajedi32 9y ago> I'm not complaining about ads and this fine is not about ads. It is about Google favoring Google Shopping links [...] Google Shopping links _are_ ads though: https://i.imgur.com/m5rGqLa.png https://i.imgur.com/m5rGqLa.png