16 ms·
According to Michael E. Mann, in 2100 it's +4.5C with no action, +3.5C with just the Paris Accord, and +1.8C with ratcheting up. (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DB
by fudgie 9y ago
According to Michael E. Mann, in 2100 it's +4.5C with no action, +3.5C with just the Paris Accord, and +1.8C with ratcheting up. (https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBQpulkWAAE2mrc.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBQpulkWAAE2mrc.jpg)
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- sparkzilla 9y agoWould that be the 'Nobel prize winner' Dr Mann, who massaged the so-called hockey stick data leading to all this climate change/global warming hysteria in the first place? Hardly a credible source of anything IMHO.
- glup 9y agocite your sources please
- sparkzilla 9y agohttps://www.amazon.com/22A-Disgrace-Profession-22-Steyn-editor/dp/0986398330/ref=as_li_ss_tl?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1482417009&sr=1-1&keywords=Steyn+disgrace+to+the+profession&linkCode=sl1&tag=steyn-20&linkId=19e34bc537199fe881f1c2d288a7c5c1 https://www.amazon.com/22A-Disgrace-Profession-22-Steyn-edit...
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- alayne 9y agoFalse. That is "skeptic" nonsense. Note the quotes around skeptic because I don't consider climate denialists true skeptics. "Climategate" was reviewed extensively by numerous organizations and no wrongdoing was found. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_controversy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic_Research_Unit_email_c...
- sparkzilla 9y agoDear oh dear. Using Wikipedia to support Climate Change denial denial? Ignorance is bliss I guess. This is a good overview I picked from a random search of the many issues with Mann's work re the Hockey stick, and his lack of professional integrity [1], which is even hinted at in the well-scrubbed Wikipedia page. Anyway there's a ton of easy-to-find extremely well-sourced information debunking the stick. By the way, Mann was forced to stop calling himself a 'Nobel Prize recipient', after it was found out that he wasn't directly awarded the prize; it was awarded to the IPCC.[2] [1] https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/03/29/reflections-on-mark-steyns-a-disgrace-to-the-profession-about-dr-michael-mann/ https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/03/29/reflections-on-mark-s... [2] http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/331738/michael-manns-false-nobel-claim-charles-c-w-cooke# http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/331738/michael-manns-fa...
- alayne 9y agoYou posted a garbage book by a non scientist well known conservative climate denier. You are a crackpot and I don't have any more time for this.