6 ms·

Compared to the # of users -- i.e. orders of magnitude greater -- that's a pretty reasonably-sized team.

• cuchoi 9y ago
  "As of January 2016, 45.4 million persons were participating in SNAP." https://www.snaptohealth.org/snap/snap-frequently-asked-questions/#howmany https://www.snaptohealth.org/snap/snap-frequently-asked-ques... https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/pd/SNAPsummary.pdf https://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/pd/SNAPsummary.... http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jul/21/donald-trump/trump-43-million-americans-food-stamps/ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jul/...
  • lovich 9y ago
    I think they meant SNAP the ticker symbol for Snapchat and not the government program.
  • wand3r 9y ago
    I also thought it was that Snap initially.
• ac29 9y ago
  Compared to revenue it doesnt seem crazy either: at approx $150M in Q1-17, thats over $300k revenue per employee per year (if the revenue and headcount stays flat). Certainly there are many profitable companies at a ratio like that. But for ad-fueled companies the bar to profitability and long term success is quite a bit higher: Alphabet does about 4x that ($1.3M/employee/year) [0], and Facebook does even better ($1.8M/employee/year) [1][2]. [0] https://abc.xyz/investor/news/earnings/2017/Q1_alphabet_earnings/ https://abc.xyz/investor/news/earnings/2017/Q1_alphabet_earn... [1] https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2017/Facebook-Reports-First-Quarter-2017-Results/ https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/... [2] https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/ https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/